<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Elizabeth Gill</title>
        <link>http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:42:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>Community Filmmaking</title>
            <description><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Professor Jonathan Pope Evans took a group of California State University, Los Angeles Television and Film students and a handful of East Los Angeles teenagers and over the course of a 10-week semester, produced four successful short films. On December 5, Plaza de la Raza, a community cultural arts center, hosted "Through the Eyes of Eastside Youth: An Evening of Community Films" showcasing the result of a service learning course called "Community Filmmaking" at Cal State Los Angeles.<br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/2009/01/community-filmmaking.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/2009/01/community-filmmaking.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:42:13 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>A Lesson In Fire Safety</title>
            <description><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; It's hard to believe that the Tea Fire, burned 1,940 acres, destroyed 231 residences, and caused an estimated $6,100,000 to fight, was caused by a group of college students who didn't fully extinguish their bonfire. <br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/montecito.jpg"><img alt="montecito.jpg" src="http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/assets_c/2008/11/montecito-thumb-250x166.jpg" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 20px 20px; float: right;" height="166" width="250" /></a></span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; "It's carelessness, it's negligence, and it's illegal," says Captain Eli Iskow of the Santa Barbara Fire Department, the team that led the investigation of the Tea Fire. Iskow has seen people lose their lives and end up in critical condition as a result of unintentional fires. "We could have several of those a year. It's not uncommon. It's carelessness that does it."<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <br />
<div><br /></div><div><br /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/2008/11/-its-hard-to-believe.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/2008/11/-its-hard-to-believe.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:17:02 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Election Morning in San Francisco</title>
            <description><![CDATA[&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Before the celebration and crowds that erupted over the Bay Area on election evening, the atmosphere on election morning in San Francisco was quiet excitement. Polling stations were opened across the city, but the most crowded polling station was the basement of San Francisco City Hall. Although this polling station drew the most people, the lines never got a chance to develop because the number of volunteers that turned out seemed to equal the number of voters. The volunteers ranged from Senior Citizens to children as young as young as twelve years old who are shown handing out "I Voted" stickers as people entered and left the basement of City Hall. <br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 
<object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" id="soundslider" height="533" width="620"><param name="movie" value="http://egill.webng.com/Election%20Day%20%2708/soundslider.swf?size=1&amp;format=xml" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="menu" value="false" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><embed src="http://egill.webng.com/Election%20Day%20%2708/soundslider.swf?size=1&amp;format=xml" quality="high" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" menu="false" allowscriptaccess="sameDomain" allowfullscreen="true" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" height="533" width="620"></object>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Upstairs in the ground level of City Hall, couples were getting married atop the large flight of steps while people passed by down below en route to the voting booths. Outside, people gathered in the community garden and cheered in front of City Hall holding signs supporting Obama, Nader, No on Proposition 8, and Yes on Proposition K. <br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; At another popular polling station off of Castro in San Francisco's Castro District, where a house with a sign reading "Heart of the Castro" was transformed into a voting station.<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; At Northpoint Coffee Co. in Sausalito, people quietly read the morning paper while shadowed by portraits of political leaders lining the walls of the coffee shop.The graphite portraits are done by Amanda Pirot as part of her collection "Politicals, Leaders, and Cultural Icons." <br />]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/2008/11/election-morning-in-san-franci.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/2008/11/election-morning-in-san-franci.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:33:55 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>&quot;Debate&quot; Lacking Actual Debate Qualifications</title>
            <description><![CDATA[The second presidential debate came and went, and my hopes for a real debate were once again dashed. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, (OED) a debate equals "Contention in argument; dispute, controversy; discussion; <i>esp.</i> the discussion of questions of public interest in Parliament or in any assembly."<div><br /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/2008/10/the-second-presidential-debate.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/2008/10/the-second-presidential-debate.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:10:31 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Slideshow: First Attempt</title>
            <description><![CDATA[ <object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" id="soundslider" height="533" width="620"><param name="movie" value="http://egill.webng.com/mb%20slideshow/soundslider.swf?size=1&amp;format=xml" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="menu" value="false" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><embed src="http://egill.webng.com/mb%20slideshow/soundslider.swf?size=1&amp;format=xml" quality="high" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" menu="false" allowscriptaccess="sameDomain" allowfullscreen="true" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" height="533" width="620"></object>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/2008/10/slideshow-first-attempt.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/2008/10/slideshow-first-attempt.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:27:40 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Obama-McCain Face-Off Not Exactly Newsworthy, But Media Tries Anyway</title>
            <description><![CDATA[&nbsp;As I started looking at different sources of <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10053056-38.html">media coverage</a> after Friday's debate between Obama and McCain, I started thinking about the role of the media in determining what is "newsworthy."&nbsp; <span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/newsworthy.jpg"><img alt="newsworthy.jpg" src="http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/newsworthy-thumb-200x200.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt; float: left;" height="200" width="200" /></a></span>After watching the debate, I looked at some of the coverage today on the websites of various news organizations including <a href="http://elections.foxnews.com/">Fox News</a>, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26910292/page/2/">MSNBC</a>, and <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/">The Washington Post</a>. These articles have titles such as "<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26910292/page/2/">No knockouts in debate: Economic jabs, then punches on world affairs</a>" (The Washington Post)&nbsp; or "T<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/26/AR2008092603593.html?sid%3DST2008092601943&amp;sub=new">emperature of debate? Lukewarm</a>" (also from The Washington Post). These articles seemed fairly objective in presenting both positives and negatives from each candidate while also acknowledging that nothing especially amazing happened during the debate. This was also my impression after watching the debate. The debate was significant in that it was the first official debate between Obama and McCain in the 2008 run for President, but at the same time nothing new or out of the ordinary seemed to happen. Both McCain and Obama articulated aspects of their campaign or positions on events that the general public had already heard before.<br /><br />[Full Debate Seen Below] &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <br /> <object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/F-nNIEduEOw&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/F-nNIEduEOw&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" height="344" width="425"></object>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/2008/09/what-surprised-me-most-about.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/2008/09/what-surprised-me-most-about.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:15:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>How to Spot Spin</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<br /><div>When I first heard the name <a href="http://spinspotter.com/home">SpinSpotter.com</a>, I was unsure how seriously the website took it's claim to "spot spin." Upon visiting the website, however, their
mission in providing news free of "spin" or bias seems very real and
earnest. It even gets quite technical. <br /><br />On the Spin Spotter Ethics page under the "<a href="http://spinspotter.com/rules">Rules of Spin</a>" section, it goes to say, "The neat thing about the adaptive SpinSpotter
technology is the ability to filter and identify the presence of spin
in any news article, web site, press release, or thinly disguised
political talk sheet. With the guidance of our Journalism Advisory
Board, we'll continually refine our algorithms and spin-catching
skills." I don't know much about algorithms or the technicalities to
how SpinSpotter.com really works, but the fact that one can rely on a
computer to detect spin makes me skeptical.<br /><br /></div><div><br /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/2008/09/when-i-first-heard-the.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/2008/09/when-i-first-heard-the.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:36:19 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>No Such Thing as a Free Ride</title>
            <description><![CDATA[When talking about the media coverage of the 2008 Presidential election, it is interesting to think about who might be getting a "free ride" with the press in terms of media coverage. Recently Sarah Palin agreed to sit down for her<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=5795641&amp;page=1"> first interview with ABC's Charlie Gibson</a>.<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/abc_gibson_palin_080912_mn.jpg"><img alt="abc_gibson_palin_080912_mn.jpg" src="http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/abc_gibson_palin_080912_mn-thumb-250x187.jpg" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 20px 20px; float: right;" height="187" width="250" /></a></span> When I first heard this news from online blogging sites, the posts seemed pretty skeptical of Gibson's ability to ask "hard hitting" questions. For example, see <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/10/palin-why-gibson-got-the_n_125349.html">number 6</a> of this blogger's post on <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/">The Huffington Post</a> or <a href="http://gawker.com/5046460/team-mccain-chooses-charles-softball-gibson-for-first-sarah-palin-tv-interview">this post</a> on <a href="http://www.gawker.com/">Gawker</a> which refers to Gibson as Charlie 'Softball' Gibson. There seemed to be a lot of questions raised about whether Palin was getting a free ride with the press by selecting to grant an interview to Charlie Gibson. <br /><br /><a href="http://odeo.com/episodes/23340645-Smash-Mix-169-9-12-08"><br /></a>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/2008/09/when-talking-about-the-media.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/2008/09/when-talking-about-the-media.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:47:37 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Coverage of Sarah Palin: An Example of Neutrality versus Transparency</title>
            <description><![CDATA[I can't help bring up Sarah Palin when discussing transparent versus neutral journalism. <br /><br />
I think one particularly interesting story that appeared on <a href="http://gawker.com/">Gawker</a> on the night of Palin's speech at the Republican National
Convention is <a href="http://gawker.com/5045209/reuters-reports-sarah-palins-speech-before-she-gives-it">this one</a>, in which Reuter's published a story on Palin's speech <i>before</i>
it actually happened.&nbsp; <img src="file:///Users/lizgill/Library/Caches/TemporaryItems/moz-screenshot-5.jpg" alt="" />I clicked on the link in the story before the speech took place and
Reuter's did, in fact, publish the story before the event. <img src="file:///Users/lizgill/Library/Caches/TemporaryItems/moz-screenshot-6.jpg" alt="" />This story,
tagged by author Ryan Tate as "Journalismism," writes, "Presumably,
<a href="http://www.reuters.com/">Reuters's</a> coverage of the forthcoming Republican convention address by
Sarah Palin
is based on a pre-distributed written version of the speech, and that's
why the report at left was posted at least an hour ago. But shouldn't
the future tense be employed, or a disclaimer be included, given that
the speech hasn't, you know, occurred yet?"<br /><br />
<br /><div><a href="http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/Sarah%20Palin%20Alaska%20from%20Patriot%20Room.JPG"><img alt="Sarah Palin Alaska from Patriot Room.JPG" src="http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/Sarah%20Palin%20Alaska%20from%20Patriot%20Room-thumb-200x262.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="262" width="200" /></a></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/2008/09/it-seems-as-though-the.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/2008/09/it-seems-as-though-the.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 13:41:02 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>McCain on Leno</title>
            <description><![CDATA[In Clay Shirky's "<a href="http://www.shirky.com/">Here Comes Everybody</a>," he compares the state of journalism today to the late 1400s when Johannes Gutenberg invented the printing press, thus replacing the sacred role of the scribe with the technology of mass reproduction. Today, legacy journalism sources find themselves competing with the
rise of Internet accessible user generated content in the form of
blogs, citizen journals, etc. <br />&nbsp; <img src="http://www.weblogcartoons.com/cartoons/famous.gif" alt="cartoon from www.weblogcartoons.com" />
<p>Cartoon by <a href="http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/">Dave Walker</a>.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.weblogcartoons.com/">We Blog Cartoons</a>.</p><br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/2008/08/mccain-on-leno.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/2008/08/mccain-on-leno.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:51:01 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Prototype&apos;s Women&apos;s Center Not For the Well-Behaved</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<!--StartFragment--><p class="MsoNormal">As I was leaving <a href="http://www.prototypes.org/locations_nav_left_defbottom.htm#pomona">Prototypes Women's Center</a>, which houses
Women's Re-entry Court participants in Pomona, California, a bumper sticker
plastered to the outside of a conference room caught my eye: "Well behaved
women rarely make history." </p><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/IMG_1884.JPG"><img alt="IMG_1884.JPG" src="http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/assets_c/2008/10/IMG_1884-thumb-200x150.jpg" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 20px 20px; float: right;" height="150" width="200" /></a></span><p class="MsoNormal">I think this quote from Laurel Thatcher Ulrich<span style=""><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: '-editor-proxy';"></span></span> captured the spirit of the re-entering
facility: the rebellious spirit of these women as unique and separate to the
vast majority of society coupled with a new sense of self-empowerment with this
position. As we sat in front of a selected group of 8 women from the facility,
we listened to the stories of how they came to be in the position they are now:
abandonment, rape, drug addiction, abuse, Grand Theft Auto, prison, multiple
arrests, etc.&nbsp;<span style=""></span></p><!--EndFragment-->


 <div><br /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/2008/08/criminal-justice-field-trip.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/2008/08/criminal-justice-field-trip.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:40:27 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Why Journalism</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<!--StartFragment-->

<p class="MsoNormal">The first thing that drew me to journalism was the writing
aspect. As an undergraduate at Columbia, I majored in English Literature and Creative
Writing, so I was usually immersed in various forms of fiction and poetry
rather than studying the practice of journalism. My interests in journalism
developed out of the fact that journalists tell stories that aren't just
metaphorically, but also literally true. I like stories and pieces of journalism that make you think and bring you into a world or event that you would otherwise not have known it existed. <br /></p>

<!--EndFragment-->


 ]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/2008/08/1st-assnpersonal-statement.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/elizabeth_gill/2008/08/1st-assnpersonal-statement.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:33:43 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
