Steven Mikulan: Theater Critic, Editor, Trial Reporter, Unemployed
TrackBacks (0)
Comments (10)

Betsy A. Ross speaks fondly of the first Robert Blake trial, in which Blake was acquitted of murdering his wife, Bonny Lee Bakely. It was during that trial, which concluded in March 2005, that Ross met former LA Weekly editor and reporter Steven Mikulan.
"He and I were both new to covering trials," Ross said. "He was quite nice to me, and when I ran into him at the Phil Spector trial, he saved a little spot for me."
Ross, who runs the legal blog Trials & Tribulations, reported on the Spector trial as part of a group of friendly journalists that included Mikulan, LA Daily Journal writer Ciaran McEvoy, and the late former Vanity Fair writer Dominic Dunne.
"Of all the accredited press, [Mikulan] was the one who was most accepting," Ross said.
Until his firing last week, Mikulan was a longstanding employee of the Weekly who had covered some of the biggest criminal trials of the last 10 years in Los Angeles: Robert Blake. Phil Spector. Anthony Pellicano. Anand Jon. He had reached his 25-year milestone and gained high esteem from friends and colleagues as a "superior writer" in the tradition of Gay Talese, Norman Mailer, and Truman Capote.
However, as several of his colleagues have attested, Milkulan's talent was not being utilized under the Weekly's new management, which came into power after the merger of New Times Media, the Weekly's parent company, with Village Voice Media was finalized in 2006.
"This is all part of a long, downward spiral for the Weekly," said Robert Iafolla, now a staff writer at the LA Daily Journal, who covered some of the same trials that Mikulan did. Calls and e-mails to the Weekly were not returned.
Mikulan began as a freelance writer for the Weekly in 1983, after completing a graduate playwriting program at UCLA. He started writing theater reviews "for five dollars a pop," remembers Mikulan, before being promoted to the position of Calendar Editor. By 1986, he had been named the paper's Theater Editor, a position he held for 10 years.
"It's sort of an embarrassment to be at one place for so long," Mikulan said, adding that he had not intended to continue working at the Weekly for more than a few years.
Asked why he didn't find work at other Los Angeles publications, he said: "It's possible that I had pissed off some people at the LA Times."
Mikulan gained praise for his theater writing at the Weekly, winning the George Jean Nathan Award for Dramatic Criticism for his reviews in 1990.
Yet, many Angelenos know Mikulan not for his theater writing, but for his trial and politics coverage. At the urging of then-news editor Alan Mittelstaedt, Mikulan began his foray into trial coverage at the Robert Blake trail. According to several colleagues, he was a natural.
"He brought the keen eye of a theater critic to the courtroom, developing characters in high-profile trials like no one else in L.A. He made murder entertaining," Mittelstaedt said.
Mikulan agrees that his theater background has given him a unique perspective on the courtroom.
"It allowed me to step outside of what was going on in court and view it from sort of an artistic perspective," he said. "You don't want to trivialize a murder trial, but you take it off of its Hegelian pedestal."
Ciaran McEvoy, writing for the City News Service during the Phil Spector and Anthony Pellicano trials, both of which Mikulan covered also, said that attorneys in the respective cases respected Mikulan's work and would ask him about it during recesses. He laments Mikulan's firing from the Weekly.
"It's a loss for the Weekly and L.A. journalism," McEvoy said.
Mikulan declined to talk in detail about the circumstances surrounding the termination of his employment, citing terms of his severance agreement. About the current management, he explained:
"They have a business paradigm that they strongly believe in. However, it's not a paradigm that's been used before at the Weekly."
In November of last year, Mikulan was told that he would not be writing print stories anymore, and would instead oversee the Weekly's blog content. It wasn't a perfect fit, said colleagues.
"Steve blogging was like using a Ferrari to deliver pizza. He deserves, and will surely find, a better venue for his talent," said Iafolla.
Mikulan agreed. "I wish I had remained as a regular writer both in print and online," he said. "My strengths lay in writing longer pieces."
As such a long-time employee of the Weekly, Mikulan had gained a reputation as someone who could be trusted by his fellow employees. Until September of this year, he served as president of the L.A. Weekly Machinists Union, a title he held for four years. He called the experience, which involved speaking on behalf of workers on both the editorial and printing sides of the organization, "very trying."
"It's sort of like an existential dilemma," Mikulan said. "You're trying to save people, but you can't. You can really only save their jobs for a few months or a year. Because sooner or later everyone loses their jobs."
The LA Weekly's firing of Steven Mikulan is simply an outrage. Over the course of his tenure at the Weekly, he has been both one of the voices that defined what the Weekly was as an alternative news outlet, and absolutely unique -- with a range that moved seemingly effortlessly between theatre and the theatre of daily life. It was a genius move to assign him to some of the major courtroom dramas of the last several years; but his range is so much greater than that. There is no voice and style quite like his -- wry, thoughtful, wonderfully informed, acutely observed, nuanced to the most delicate turn. It was that turn of his verbal lathe (I'm imagining an ever so delicately arched eyebrow here) that made almost everything he wrote at LAW worth reading.
It's hard to say this about anyone -- but within the context of the LA Weekly as the alternative news & arts weekly it was (& I supppose still is to some vastly diminished extent), there is NO REPLACING someone like Steven Mikulan. He was one of its ultimate voices -- the epitome of what the Weekly was and SHOULD BE about. I have no idea what the current owners' "business paradigm", that Steven refers to in his own limited comments, might be -- but it's bloody BANKRUPT. You do not make a more saleable product by diminishing it. (The financial & business ineptitude of some of L.A.'s business leadership -- self-styled "money", "numbers" guys -- never ceases to astound me.) You also have to wonder if they have a comparable 'JOURNALISM PARADIGM.' You have to wonder if they have a clue, PERIOD.
I have no doubt the remainders, the free-lancers, and some of these ex-L.A. Times or Times-style writers & editors will somehow manage to cobble together a little bundle of pages to throw to their ever less-discriminating audience (though their dubious record at the Times itself is enough to raise considerable doubt), but it is a diminished product and NOTHING can disguise that fact. Evidence to the contrary, mediocrity is not what wins prizes or, more importantly, what commands our sustained interest and respect. At some point, this level of managerial, editorial and intellectual cowardice (& simply incompetence) is going to turn its audience away in repudiation. Steven Mikulan will survive and thrive wherever he lands. But the cowardice on display at the Weekly is very ugly.
The American electorate managed to vote for "hope" in the last election; and I have to hope L.A. readers and advertisers will raise their voices to arrest this appalling downward slide in their hometown journalism.
Ezrha Jean Black
Marissa, it's fine if you continue to read The Wrap and ignore Nikki Finke because you don't like her style. Finke's scoops end up at The Wrap anyways, albeit hours and days later. But, in the end, you'll learn the same details about the mishaps of Hollywood power. Now have a nice day, please.
Who cares who scoops who on Hollywood news? Big deal. Waxman is a solid, trusted reporter. Finke is unreliable and obviously over the edge.
How splendid that Steve will be doing a column for Sharon Waxman. Maybe he can help her stop getting scooped every 10 minutes by the best entertainment website in Hollywood. I'm speaking, of course, of Nikki Finke. Finke beats Waxman on all of the big stories.
i agree with all those who lament steve mikulan's departure from the la weekly. but it's not a loss to la journalism. steve will now be writing at thewrap.com, anchoring his new column, L.A. Noir.
but he couldn't wait to get started, and neither could we. here's his first piece, on the anna nicole smith case: Anna Nicole Smith Hearing: a Woman in Pain.
http://www.thewrap.com/article/anna-nicole-smith-hearing-woman-pain-8741
Best of luck to Mikulan. I interviewed him for a healthcare for journalists piece and he was very nice and helpful. Hopefully his good karma will help him find another job shortly. "Name Withheld": I may not be completely convinced but I find your accusations hilarious.
Steve is a great loss for LA Weekly. it's a rag nowadays.
I loved Steven's writing, and think that his dismissal is a big blow to the paper. But it's ridiculous to think that the paper is being run as a refugee center for former Timesians. Scattergood, Katz and Miles were writing for the Weekly long before the current regime. The last two editors were also former Times employees, and the one before that jumped to the Times within milliseconds of his dismissal. There are a lot of reasons to be unhappy with the Weekly these days, but that isn't close to being one of them.
Hey, Name Withheld, ever hear about change? Good people get hurt, good people get help. Get over yourself.
It is very, very sad to see Steve go. He will be missed as a great voice. There is another story that is under the radar. New editor Heikes has quietly done away with all the regular Weekly freelancers and replaced them with his old friends from the LA Times.
In addition it is suspected by some that Heikes has been brought in to create an advertorial situation with the help of the publisher and ad director. He was involved in the Staples/LA Times Magazine advertorial affair as well if you recall.
Since the
takeover by Mr. Heikes of LA Times fame late August, he seems to be on a
spending spree to employ his old LA Times mates. When they worked for the
Times these same people wouldn’t wipe their asses with the Weekly but now
that they have mortgages due and kids in private schools, Heikes is
determined to see that they get paid. Here are three more former LA Times folks now on the freelance LA
Weekly payroll for this past issue:
Amy Scattergood
Dani Katz
Christopher Miles
See comment below:
{This was posted regarding LA Weekly's Cover Story and three articles regarding the amazing conductor – see last week’s edition – PAGE ONE FULL PAGE AD FOR DISNEY SYMPHONY. Prediction: you will begin to see cover stories on movie stars and more movie tie-in ads. Editorial in the future will be tied into ads.}
Letter to the Editor:
You know, nothing speaks louder to the pain of almost everyone here in Los
Angeles, the unemployment, the evictions, the bankruptcies, than a cover
story about classical music. Wait! Excuse me – THREE articles about
classical music! I wonder if that happened during the first Great
Depression? Well, the new LA Weekly seems to be going down a different
path. It is helping the unemployed all right – the unemployed from the LA
TIMES. Always priding itself on being the thorn in the side of mainstream
journalism, the new LA Weekly, now under the direction of an 18 year
veteran of the LA Times is doing what is necessary – helping out former LA
Times writers to the chagrin of former freelance LA Weekly writers. In
addition, those new writers apparently without LA Times credentials seem to
be from other cities far, far away.
Seems as if the “villagers” have decided to feed at the trough they once
mocked- alternative journalism.
Heres the tally from the last two issues:
Oscar Garza —-LA Times
Chris Pasles —-LA Times
Drex Heikes—–LA Times
Peter Jamison – San Francisco resident/SF Weekly writer
Robert Wilonsky – Dallas Times-Herald and Dallas Observer
Gustavo Turner—writes for Providence Phoenix mostly
Dennis Romero —Former LA Times Staff Writer
Nate Berg – Planetizen? WTF?
Diana Ljungaeus –Executive Director of the LA Press Club
Honorable Mention to Samantha Peale a novelist who through no fault of her
own, for some reason gets to review her own book, “Essential Beauty.”
Keep up the good work.
We’ll be out of this recession in no time and hopefully you guys can go
back to work for “regular” newspapers.