
The media's focus on the first presidential debate between
Sens. John McCain and Barack Obama was unique this year. Days, even hours, before the
debate, the big question on everyone's mind was not about its substance; it was whether there would even be a debate. After McCain
announced a campaign suspension, Obama replied that the debate should go on, because this is the best time for voters to hear each candidate's views and
policies, especially regarding the economy.
As soon as the debate ended, both campaigns announced their
candidate the clear winner.
"This was a clear victory for Barack Obama on John
McCain's home turf. Sen. McCain offered nothing but more of the same failed
Bush policies, and Barack Obama made a forceful case for change in our economy
and our foreign policy." - David Plouffe, Obama-Biden campaign manager
"John McCain won this debate and controlled the dialogue
throughout, whether it was the economy, taxes, spending, Iraq or Iran. There
was a leadership gap, a judgment gap and a boldness gap on display tonight, a
fact Barack Obama acknowledged when he said John McCain was right at least five
times." - Jill Hazelbaker, McCain-Palin communications director
But media coverage post-debate was, for the most part,
uneventful. No one went for the jugular. There was no clear winner in the media; most analysts and
commentators declared the outcome of the debate to be a "tie" before
(sometimes) announcing who they believed took the lead. Perhaps this was
because, as the LA Times stated, the presidential debate was "largely polite."
Recent Comments